data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/674d5/674d533da78db870d2eb357de42436d31615b6c3" alt=""
I'm not a lichen expert, but having referred to the text books, I'm fairly confident the species here is Caloplaca citrina. The apothecia (the little, yellow spore-producing 'pin cushions') are spread about over a powdery, yellow thallus. Were this C. holocarpa (another common Calopaca with yellow/orange apothecia) the thallus would be grey. The thallus of C. dalmatia is cracked by thin black lines. The lack of any change in lichen texture / colour near the perimeter of the patch also distinguishes it from other various other superficially similar Caloplaca species such as C. decipiens. Identifying lichen is all about noting the tiny details!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf400/cf40090e3d4a2fd424333a00c328adbf4a3088e3" alt=""
I've read a suggestion that the purpose of yellow colouration in lichens is to provide protection against the harmful UV part of sunlight. I'm happy to accept this but it makes me wonder why only some lichens need to bother (there are plenty that don't: green, grey, white and even black lichens being commonplace - the two Verrucaria lichens I've previously blogged for example) .
Finally, the fact that C. citrina occupies the lower sills or my house and X. parietina the upper ones, makes me wonder whether the latter is more tolerant of low light conditions. Can anyone tell me?
1 comment:
X. parietina often grows on enriched sites such as under bird roosting points e.g. roofs under the ridges or below television aerials. Would your upper and lower window sills differ in that respect? It will grow abundantly in fairly deep shade but, in such cases, it loses its yellow colouration and is a uniform pale grey. A look at the shaded and unshaded branches of old Hawthorn bushes is usually a good demonstration of this.
Post a Comment